From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/34] migration thread and queue
Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2012 15:27:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50D471C6.7000105@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ehikmeqj.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
Il 21/12/2012 01:27, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
> #!/bin/sh
>
> gzip -d -c lidb.ssmall.img.gz | \
> ~/build/qemu/x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 -cdrom \
> ~/isos/OCDC-lucid-Test-Drive-20110523_140333.iso -enable-kvm -m 2G \
> -incoming exec:dd
>
> With lidb.ssmall.img.gz being generated from a 'migrate exec:dd of=...'
> from qemu.git just a week or two ago.
So it breaks *incoming* migration, which would restrict the problem to
the beginning of the patch (reorganization of the RAM block list).
Everything else touches only outgoing migration.
However, I tested bidirectional migration between origin/master and
Juan's branch and it passed
x86_64-softmmu/qemu-system-x86_64 \
-drive if=virtio,cache=none,file=/../images/jeos-17-64.qcow2 \
-vnc :1 -incoming "exec:cat foo" --enable-kvm
I also tested both my and Juan's branches and they both pass all
migration tests.
> I can't bisect tonight but can attempt to tomorrow. How has this been
> tested?
Indeed old->new and new->old migration wasn't tested AFAIK. Not by me
at least.
Paolo
> I'm a little concerned here about the timing. With the Christmas
> and New Years holiday we're pretty darn close to soft freeze for 1.4.
>
> Has this series gone through a full autotest run with multiple guests?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-21 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-20 23:02 [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/34] migration thread and queue Juan Quintela
2012-12-21 0:27 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-12-21 1:39 ` Juan Quintela
2012-12-21 12:35 ` Juan Quintela
2012-12-21 13:35 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-12-21 12:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-21 13:20 ` Juan Quintela
2012-12-21 13:39 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-12-21 13:48 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-21 17:21 ` Juan Quintela
2012-12-21 8:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-21 14:14 ` Anthony Liguori
2012-12-21 14:27 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2012-12-22 2:22 ` Anthony Liguori
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-12-21 19:41 Juan Quintela
2012-12-27 15:30 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-12-27 15:44 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-27 15:51 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2012-12-27 16:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
2012-12-27 16:32 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50D471C6.7000105@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).