From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38418)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>) id 1TnpiR-0003w5-Ds
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:04:08 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>) id 1TnpiQ-0006Le-DQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:04:07 -0500
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.126.186]:49654)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>) id 1TnpiQ-0006LZ-3x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Dec 2012 07:04:06 -0500
Message-ID: <50DAE7B7.7040400@rdsoftware.de>
Date: Wed, 26 Dec 2012 13:04:07 +0100
From: Erik Rull <erik.rull@rdsoftware.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Graphics performance
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>

Hi all,

which is the graphics emulation with the lowest CPU usage for 2D-only GUIs? 
(e.g. Win XP without Direct3D usage)? I just need to drive a virtual 
graphics display with 1024x768 (@16bit colors). At the moment I use the 
cirrus graphics card emulation. Is there something more efficient? 
Terminal/Console is either a real display or VNC - maybe for the two 
versions different adaptors bring the best performance for each of them?

Thanks.

Best regards,

Erik