From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37601)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1TqPZ2-00065d-En
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:45:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1TqPYy-0005np-LA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:45:04 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53486 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1TqPYy-0005my-FD
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 02 Jan 2013 09:45:00 -0500
Message-ID: <50E447E8.7030305@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 02 Jan 2013 15:44:56 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1356719854-16401-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1356719854-16401-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Fixes for -cpu host KVM/SVM feature
 initialization
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org

Am 28.12.2012 19:37, schrieb Eduardo Habkost:
> This series has two very similar fixes for feature initizliation for "-=
cpu
> host". This should allow us to make the check/enforce code check for ho=
st
> support of KVM and SVM features, later.

I am out of my field here to verify whether this is semantically correct
and whether any fallback code may be needed. However, this will conflict
with X86CPU subclasses, so I'd be interested in taking this through my
qom-cpu queue if there are acks from the KVM folks.

Regards,
Andreas

> Eduardo Habkost (2):
>   target-i386: kvm: -cpu host: use GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID for SVM features
>   target-i386: kvm: enable all supported KVM features for -cpu host
>=20
>  target-i386/cpu.c | 13 ++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg