From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50715) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrEPA-0002nz-JF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:02:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrEP5-0004OQ-G4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:02:16 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:55806 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TrEP5-0004OI-9M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 04 Jan 2013 16:02:11 -0500 Message-ID: <50E7434E.5000305@suse.de> Date: Fri, 04 Jan 2013 22:02:06 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87ehi3qwzm.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87ehi3qwzm.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [FYI] Testing new patch management scripts... List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi, Am 02.01.2013 19:07, schrieb Anthony Liguori: > 2) Patches that no longer apply via git am --3way will receive a > notification. Isn't Nacked-by too strong of a notification for a mere technical need for a rebase (compared to a rejection of its concept/approach)? Also, since quite a few of such messages have been appearing on the list already, might it make sense to shorten the message and rather link to some qemu.org Wiki page to spare subscribers' mailboxes? Regards, Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg