From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58873) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ts9IB-0006gy-6N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 04:46:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ts9IA-0003Nc-6W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 04:46:51 -0500 Message-ID: <50EA9982.6020401@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 10:46:42 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201301042021.r04KL7Z9030205@d03av04.boulder.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QEMU: PPC: set has-idle in guest device tree List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexander Graf Cc: Anthony Liguori , "qemu-ppc@nongnu.org" , Stuart Yoder , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On 01/04/13 21:46, Alexander Graf wrote: > > > Am 04.01.2013 um 21:21 schrieb Anthony Liguori : > >> Hi, >> >> This is an automated message generated from the QEMU Patches. >> Thank you for submitting this patch. This patch no longer applies to qemu.git. > > Great idea, but not patricularly useful for ppc patches :). Could you please just omit patches that have a CC on qemu-ppc? :) >> 3) Basing this patch off of a branch that isn't tracking the QEMU >> master branch. If that was done purposefully, please include the name >> of the tree in the subject line in the future to prevent this message. >> >> For instance: "[PATCH block-next 1/10] qcow3: add fancy new feature" [PATCH ppc-next ...] ? cheers, Gerd