From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37570) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsCTj-0005rK-VC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:11:01 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsCTe-0000Y5-To for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:10:59 -0500 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:60331 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsCTe-0000Xy-KH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2013 08:10:54 -0500 Message-ID: <50EAC956.40409@suse.de> Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2013 14:10:46 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <50D55DB2.6080601@cn.fujitsu.com> <87lic5b3j0.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <87lic5b3j0.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix bits 39:32 of the final physical address when using 4M page List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wen Congyang Cc: Luiz Capitulino , Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel Am 07.01.2013 13:06, schrieb Markus Armbruster: > Wen Congyang writes: >=20 >> ((pde & 0x1fe000) << 19) is the bits 39:32 of the final physical addre= ss, and >> we shouldn't use unit32_t to calculate it. Convert the type to hwaddr = to fix >> this problem. >=20 > Spotted by Coverity. >=20 >> Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang >> >> --- >> target-i386/arch_memory_mapping.c | 11 ++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/target-i386/arch_memory_mapping.c b/target-i386/arch_memo= ry_mapping.c >> index c6c7874..844893f 100644 >> --- a/target-i386/arch_memory_mapping.c >> +++ b/target-i386/arch_memory_mapping.c >> @@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ static void walk_pde2(MemoryMappingList *list, >> hwaddr pde_start_addr, int32_t a20_mask, >> bool pse) >> { >> - hwaddr pde_addr, pte_start_addr, start_paddr; >> + hwaddr pde_addr, pte_start_addr, start_paddr, high_paddr; >> uint32_t pde; >> target_ulong line_addr, start_vaddr; >> int i; >> @@ -130,8 +130,13 @@ static void walk_pde2(MemoryMappingList *list, >> =20 >> line_addr =3D (((unsigned int)i & 0x3ff) << 22); >> if ((pde & PG_PSE_MASK) && pse) { >> - /* 4 MB page */ >> - start_paddr =3D (pde & ~0x3fffff) | ((pde & 0x1fe000) << = 19); >> + /* >> + * 4 MB page: >> + * bits 39:32 are bits 20:13 of the PDE >> + * bit3 31:22 are bits 31:22 of the PDE >> + */ >> + high_paddr =3D ((hwaddr)(pde & 0x1fe000) << 19); >> + start_paddr =3D (pde & ~0x3fffff) | high_paddr; >> if (cpu_physical_memory_is_io(start_paddr)) { >> /* I/O region */ >> continue; >=20 > Extra points for extending the comment. ...and a "target-i386: " prefix in the subject would be appreciated, since it does not seem to fix a general issue. Andreas >=20 > Reviewed-by: Markus Armbruster >=20 --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg