From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47191) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsZ9C-0002te-PC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:23:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsZ9B-0004PJ-Mb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:23:18 -0500 Received: from mail-da0-f49.google.com ([209.85.210.49]:64079) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TsZ9B-0004PC-GB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 08:23:17 -0500 Received: by mail-da0-f49.google.com with SMTP id v40so193581dad.36 for ; Tue, 08 Jan 2013 05:23:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <50EC1DC0.7000000@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:23:12 +0800 From: Liu Yuan MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1355941771-3418-1-git-send-email-namei.unix@gmail.com> <87k3s6shdv.wl%morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp> <50D967C3.7020109@gmail.com> <50E58B19.2050701@gmail.com> <20130104163830.GF6310@stefanha-thinkpad.hitronhub.home> <50E7AEC4.5080309@gmail.com> <50E7BA41.3020307@gmail.com> <50E7DC9B.4080309@gmail.com> <50EACC61.2020603@redhat.com> <50EBB1CB.9030608@gmail.com> <20130108094025.GE2557@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <50EBEAD2.6070608@gmail.com> <50EBEE42.7010407@redhat.com> <50EBF755.3050607@gmail.com> <50EBFA3F.8030808@redhat.com> <50EBFE20.9010100@gmail.com> <50EC00CE.80205@redhat.com> <50EC0493.8030701@gmail.com> <50EC0D41.4070200@redhat.com> <50EC1C9A.5040006@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <50EC1C9A.5040006@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] sheepdog: implement direct write semantics List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, MORITA Kazutaka , Paolo Bonzini On 01/08/2013 09:18 PM, Liu Yuan wrote: > So the result is *not* broken. If we set cache=writethrough for > sheepdog, then WCE won't take any effect because 'flush' request will be > ignored by Sheepdog driver. The merit of this 'writethrough' is that, write request will never be interpreted as two requests: write + flush in Sheepdog driver. Thanks, Yuan