From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44704)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Tsrl7-0005r8-2f
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 04:15:41 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Tsrl6-0003Ha-1E
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 04:15:41 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58131)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1Tsrl5-0003HU-Ox
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 04:15:39 -0500
Message-ID: <50ED351D.1050702@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:15:09 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1353432821-32517-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<50ABC101.5030005@redhat.com>
	<20121121014332.GB16980@morn.localdomain>
	<50EADBCD.1070501@redhat.com>
	<20130107233401.GA24743@morn.localdomain>
	<20130107235102.GQ14265@rox.home.comstyle.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130107235102.GQ14265@rox.home.comstyle.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [SeaBIOS] SeaBIOS release for QEMU 1.3 (was Re:
 [PATCH] esp: enable busmaster)
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Brad Smith <brad@comstyle.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Kevin O'Connor <kevin@koconnor.net>, "seabios@seabios.org" <seabios@seabios.org>, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Il 08/01/2013 00:51, Brad Smith ha scritto:
>>>>> > > >> Kevin, are you okay with tagging SeaBIOS master as 1.7.2 one of these
>>>>> > > >> days?  Other opinions?
>>>> > > > 
>>>> > > > A new release can be produced if desired.  Given that there isn't much
>>>> > > > new since 1.7.1 I too would prefer to just push forward to 1.7.2.
>>> > > 
>>> > > Ping?  Meanwhile 1.4 freeze is in sight (soft freeze in one week, hard
>>> > > freeze + -rc0 feb 1st).
> Why is 1.4 being rushed so quick? Is this because 1.3.0 was so broken or
> is there something else?

Anthony decides, as release manager.

One reason I recall, is that releases in Mar/Jun/Sep/Dec do not work
well with Fedora and Ubuntu freeze dates.  Feb/May/Aug/Nov should work a
little better.

Paolo