From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58319)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Tt372-0007KW-CK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:23:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Tt371-0003HO-3O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:23:04 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:36255)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1Tt370-0003HK-TM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:23:03 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id hm2so828084wib.4
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 09 Jan 2013 13:23:02 -0800 (PST)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <50EDDFB2.9000308@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 22:22:58 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1355761490-10073-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<877gnovmgj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50ED3971.5030600@redhat.com>
	<20130109102238.GC30914@redhat.com> <50ED4C0C.5070109@redhat.com>
	<20130109110926.GA17317@redhat.com> <50ED50B7.4000907@redhat.com>
	<20130109121027.GA18244@redhat.com>
	<50EDACE6.7080706@redhat.com> <87wqvm5buw.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
In-Reply-To: <87wqvm5buw.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] qdev: make reset semantics more
 clear and consistent, reset qbuses under virtio devices
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>

Il 09/01/2013 21:40, Anthony Liguori ha scritto:
>> > Yes, but this can only be done after looking at all PCI devices that
>> > have buses below (of which the bridge is a special case).  And Anthony
>> > also metioned using a new method of PCIDevice instead of device_reset.
> Sorry, what's the bug here?  Is this a reset bug with cold reset or with
> a form of warm reset?

Warm reset (virtio status register reset) of virtio-scsi wasn't
propagated down to the SCSI bus.  I fixed it using qdev_reset_all, but
now I'll do it manually in the HBA.  I'm fine with that as long as all
buses move away from device_reset.

Paolo