From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:51684) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtDXd-0002nM-U5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:31:14 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtDXa-0003Mm-Cb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:31:13 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f181.google.com ([74.125.82.181]:47138) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtDXa-0003M7-2V for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 03:31:10 -0500 Received: by mail-we0-f181.google.com with SMTP id t11so114662wey.26 for ; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 00:31:09 -0800 (PST) Sender: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <50EE7C49.8000300@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:31:05 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <877gnovmgj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50ED3971.5030600@redhat.com> <20130109102238.GC30914@redhat.com> <50ED4C0C.5070109@redhat.com> <20130109110926.GA17317@redhat.com> <50ED50B7.4000907@redhat.com> <20130109121027.GA18244@redhat.com> <50EDACE6.7080706@redhat.com> <87wqvm5buw.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50EDDFB2.9000308@redhat.com> <20130109214019.GA11806@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20130109214019.GA11806@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] qdev: make reset semantics more clear and consistent, reset qbuses under virtio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Peter Maydell , Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Il 09/01/2013 22:40, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: > > Warm reset (virtio status register reset) of virtio-scsi wasn't > > propagated down to the SCSI bus. I fixed it using qdev_reset_all, but > > now I'll do it manually in the HBA. I'm fine with that as long as all > > buses move away from device_reset. > > You also pointed out some bug related to status register handling in virtio > on s390, right? Yes, that would be a separate patch. A large part of this series can also be kept. Paolo