From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39765) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtGbu-0008If-Jv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:47:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtGbt-0007Uj-Dp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:47:50 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12120) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TtGbt-0007UO-6Y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 06:47:49 -0500 Message-ID: <50EEAA5F.8060900@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 12:47:43 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1355761490-10073-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <877gnovmgj.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <50ED3971.5030600@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/15] qdev: make reset semantics more clear and consistent, reset qbuses under virtio devices List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= , mst@redhat.com Il 10/01/2013 12:46, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >> > It's possible. I'll move the SCSI bus away from qdev reset. >> > Anthony/Michael, can you help doing the same with PCIDevice? And >> > perhaps Peter and Andreas with sysbus? > What does it even mean to reset a sysbus? Do we do it anywhere? > (it looks like vl.c does, just as a shortcut so memory mapped devices > get their reset hooks called?) Yes, exactly. Paolo