From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35045)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1TtgN1-0006LN-PU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:18:14 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1TtgMv-0005Ek-Nw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:18:11 -0500
Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:38088 helo=mx2.suse.de)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <afaerber@suse.de>) id 1TtgMv-00059D-Hw
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 10:18:05 -0500
Message-ID: <50F02D00.6080301@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 16:17:20 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1357895886-14283-1-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<1357895886-14283-7-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com>
	<50EFFC7F.8090606@suse.de> <50F02761.6030707@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <50F02761.6030707@citrix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 6/6] hw/pc.c: Fix converting of
 ioport_register* to MemoryRegion
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Julien Grall <julien.grall@citrix.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

Am 11.01.2013 15:53, schrieb Julien Grall:
> On 01/11/2013 11:50 AM, Andreas F=E4rber wrote:
>> Am 11.01.2013 10:18, schrieb Stefan Hajnoczi:
>>> @@ -103,6 +103,11 @@ static void ioport80_write(void *opaque, hwaddr =
addr, uint64_t data,
>>>  {
>>>  }
>>> =20
>>> +static uint64_t ioport80_read(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, unsigned si=
ze)
>>> +{
>>> +    return 0xffffffffffffffff;
>>
>> Might these require ULL for i386?
>=20
> Indeed. I will resend a patch with ULL for ioport80_read and ioportF0_r=
ead.

Since this patch is already in a pull and Anthony indicated it is being
processed, can you fix this as a follow-up patch instead?

Thanks,
Andreas

--=20
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe=
rg