From: "KONRAD Frédéric" <fred.konrad@greensocs.com>
To: mdroth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
"Mark Burton" <mark.burton@greensocs.com>,
qemu-stable@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, pbonzini@redhat.com,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-s390: add a reset function to virtio-s390 devices
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 09:42:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F667ED.6010302@greensocs.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130116045229.GA2156@vm>
On 16/01/2013 05:52, mdroth wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:40:25PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> virtio-s390 devices are not being reset when their bus is. To fix
>> this, add a reset method that forwards to virtio_reset. This is
>> only needed because of the "strange" modeling of virtio devices;
>> the ->vdev link is being handled manually rather than through qdev.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Isn't this handled by virtio-refactoring ?
I mean if we have a virtio bus on this VirtIOS390Device like in this series:
http://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg149035.html
And make VirtIODevice an abstract device which connects on this bus we
can reset it with the normal way ?
> Ping. This fix doesn't appear to be upstream yet and I'm also looking to get
> this in for 1.3.1.
>
> (hint: `patches search tag:unapplied to:qemu-stable` :)
>
>> ---
>> hw/s390-virtio-bus.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/hw/s390-virtio-bus.c b/hw/s390-virtio-bus.c
>> index 7e99175..1e3e4f0 100644
>> --- a/hw/s390-virtio-bus.c
>> +++ b/hw/s390-virtio-bus.c
>> @@ -505,6 +505,13 @@ static int s390_virtio_busdev_init(DeviceState *dev)
>> return _info->init(_dev);
>> }
>>
>> +static void s390_virtio_busdev_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>> +{
>> + VirtIOS390Device *_dev = (VirtIOS390Device *)dev;
>> +
>> + virtio_reset(_dev->vdev);
>> +}
>> +
>> static void virtio_s390_device_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> {
>> DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(klass);
>> @@ -512,6 +519,7 @@ static void virtio_s390_device_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void *data)
>> dc->init = s390_virtio_busdev_init;
>> dc->bus_type = TYPE_S390_VIRTIO_BUS;
>> dc->unplug = qdev_simple_unplug_cb;
>> + dc->reset = s390_virtio_busdev_reset;
>> }
>>
>> static TypeInfo virtio_s390_device_info = {
>> --
>> 1.8.1
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 8:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-10 14:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-s390: add a reset function to virtio-s390 devices Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-16 4:52 ` mdroth
2013-01-16 8:42 ` KONRAD Frédéric [this message]
2013-01-16 10:09 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-16 5:27 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-16 10:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-16 10:31 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-19 14:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 14:20 ` Alexander Graf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F667ED.6010302@greensocs.com \
--to=fred.konrad@greensocs.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=mark.burton@greensocs.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).