From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:57039)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1Tvpm2-0002vi-D6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:44:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1Tvpm1-0005Rh-4A
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:44:54 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13085)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1Tvpm0-0005Rb-Sv
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:44:53 -0500
Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com
	(int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12])
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r0HDiqKB011547
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK)
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 17 Jan 2013 08:44:52 -0500
Message-ID: <50F80052.4050307@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2013 14:44:50 +0100
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1487580585.10884389.1358429291926.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <1487580585.10884389.1358429291926.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/2] fix two revision related errors
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Alon Levy <alevy@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

  Hi,

>> I think it would also be good to fix the driver to ignore everything
>> with or

> ... what was the end of that sentence?

.. orientation != 0, then registers every mode with the orientations it
wants, so orientation becomes unused with newer drivers (and we keep
orientation=0,1 for old driver compatibility).

But maybe this isn't worth the trouble.

cheers,
  Gerd