From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: adjust gcov variables for directory movement
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 09:52:39 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F90D57.3050806@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAu8pHvywRo_UR2NYkZt7ViTFwO-=1W8kXP81rOxKms5FMp9-A@mail.gmail.com>
Il 17/01/2013 21:43, Blue Swirl ha scritto:
>> > Blue, can you look at introducing a common variable for the coroutine
>> > backend? Like
>> >
>> > coroutine-backend-y = gthread
>> > coroutine-backend-$(CONFIG_SIGALTSTACK_COROUTINE) = sigaltstack
>> > coroutine-backend-$(CONFIG_UCONTEXT_COROUTINE) = ucontext
>> > coroutine-backend-$(CONFIG_WIN32) = win32
>> >
>> > and using it in both Makefile.objs and tests/Makefile.
>> > Another alternative is to use $(filter) to pick the one file that
>> > is actually part of $(block-obj-y). Thanks!
> OK. Related to this, perhaps it would be better to rearrange the test
> directory so that in most cases there is 1:1 relation with a test and
> the code that it tests, for example qobject/qdict.c would be tested by
> tests/qobject/qdict.c. This would simplify the Makefile a lot.
I'd prefer tests/qobject/check-qdict.c, but that's the idea yes.
> Then we could also add a dummy test for each source file mechanically
> to see how low the test coverage really is and to encourage writing
> more of them.
True, one of the points of introducing libqemuutil.a is to easily
identify code that can be unit tested and headers where gtk-doc comments
can be added.
Of course there can be other unit tests (e.g. main loop, coroutines,
QOM, etc.) but that's the low-hanging fruit.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-15 8:49 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] tests: adjust gcov variables for directory movement Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-17 20:43 ` Blue Swirl
2013-01-18 8:52 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F90D57.3050806@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).