From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>
Cc: Giuseppe Lettieri <giuseppe.lettieri@iet.unipi.it>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, v.maffione@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] bypassing pci_dma_read() and pci_dma_write() ?
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 17:14:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50F974CA.8010603@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130118160448.GA76938@onelab2.iet.unipi.it>
Il 18/01/2013 17:04, Luigi Rizzo ha scritto:
> Hi,
> with a bunch of e1000 improvements we are at a point where we are
> doing over 1Mpps (short frames) and 7-8Gbit/s (1500 byte frames)
> between two guests, and two things that are high in the "perf top"
> stats are phys_page_find() and related memory copies.
>
> Both are triggered by the pci_dma_read() and pci_dma_write(),
> which on e1000 (and presumably other frontends) are called on
> every single descriptor and every single buffer.
>
> I have then tried to access the guest memory without going every
> time through the page lookup. [...]
>
> This relies on the assumption that the ring (which is contiguous in the
> guest's physical address space) is also contiguous in the host's virtual
> address space. In principle the property could be easily verified once
> the ring is set up.
IIRC, the amount of contiguous memory is written by address_space_map in
the plen parameter.
In your case:
> + s->txring = address_space_map(pci_dma_context(&s->dev)->as,
> + base, &desclen, 0 /* is_write */);
that would be desclen on return from address_space_map.
> And of course, am i missing some important detail ?
Unfortunately yes.
First, host memory mappings could change (though they rarely do on PC).
The result of address_space_map is not guaranteed to be stable. To
avoid problems with this, however, you could use something like
hw/dataplane/hostmem.c and even avoid address_space_map altogether.
Second, that pci_dma_*() could have the addresses translated by an
IOMMU. virtio is documented to have "real" physical memory addresses,
but this does not apply to other devices.
Paolo
> Of course the above could be used conditionally if the required
> conditions hold, and then revert to the pci_dma_*()
> in other cases.
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-18 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-18 16:04 [Qemu-devel] bypassing pci_dma_read() and pci_dma_write() ? Luigi Rizzo
2013-01-18 16:14 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-01-18 16:33 ` Luigi Rizzo
2013-01-18 16:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 0:58 ` Luigi Rizzo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50F974CA.8010603@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=giuseppe.lettieri@iet.unipi.it \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rizzo@iet.unipi.it \
--cc=v.maffione@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).