From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: blauwirbel@gmail.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>,
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 1.4 0/4] Simplify Makefile.objs some more
Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2013 10:06:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50FBB3A1.6060709@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <50FB2AAB.2060805@suse.de>
Il 20/01/2013 00:22, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 19.01.2013 23:06, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> Il 19/01/2013 19:11, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
>>>>> The patches are mostly mechanical substitutions, and there is no
>>>>> user-visible change---neither in total build time, nor in the files that
>>>>> are linked into the executables.
>>> Without having tested this yet I want to remind that it is necessary for
>>> qom/cpu.c to be built twice
>>
>> Hmm, it's not anymore actually (since libuser was removed). It hasn't
>> been built twice for a month and apparently nothing broke.
>
> I surely didn't ack that.
At the time I did the move, there was no conditional CPUState field
(commit 8e98e2e80b92e08e79e27a0c20a172906cfa12d2). The only difference
between the user and softmmu qom/cpu.c was that the user version ended
up in libuser. ISTR I asked around about libuser, and the conclusion
was that it was only needed for --enable-user-pie.
> Have you actually tested linux-user to verify
> it works? It might lead to unexpected CPUState field accesses.
As I said, at the time I did the move there was no difference between
the two. Now, I am indeed quite surprised that it works, but yes---it
does, at least trivial /bin/ls.
> You are judging based on master. I have some more code movements queued
> (qom-cpu-8) and I believe it was Anthony who insisted on suppressing
> those unneeded user-only fields even if they were unconditional in
> CPU_COMMON before.
>
> qom/cpu.c is not intended to remain so small forever - any cpu_* code
> that does not depend on CPUArchState can find a new home there.
> cpu_interrupt() is being moved to qom/cpu.h and cpu_reset_interrupt() to
> qom/cpu.c for instance. And I'm working on refactoring CPU VMState, that
> either requires #ifdef'ery or lots of new stubs beyond what Eduardo added.
You can place those in a qom/cpu-softmmu.c.
What I care about is having an understandable build system. At some
point we had 12 recursive -obj-y variables and a few other non-recursive
ones. The interactions and inclusions were completely impossible to
understand.
Paolo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-20 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-19 10:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 1.4 0/4] Simplify Makefile.objs some more Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 10:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] build: move around libcacard-y definition Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 18:05 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-19 22:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 23:26 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-19 10:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] build: use -$(CONFIG_SECCOMP) instead of ifeq Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 18:06 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-19 10:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] build: remove universal-obj-y Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 10:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] build: remove extra-obj-y Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 18:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for 1.4 0/4] Simplify Makefile.objs some more Andreas Färber
2013-01-19 22:06 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 22:07 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-01-19 23:22 ` Andreas Färber
2013-01-20 9:06 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50FBB3A1.6060709@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).