From: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
To: Kuo-Jung Su <dantesu@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
i.mitsyanko@samsung.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Blue Swirl <blauwirbel@gmail.com>,
Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
Kuo-Jung Su <dantesu@faraday-tech.com>,
fred.konrad@greensocs.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/20] arm: add Faraday a36x SoC platform support
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 10:47:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <510B8F1A.6080404@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK65tU7-Ds2sTycK_owLzNUsJpfapFyh3AxFYn0mBzzcXWOObw@mail.gmail.com>
嗨 國榮,
Am 01.02.2013 09:57, schrieb Kuo-Jung Su:
> Thanks for the information, and sorry for the mess I've done.
You don't need to apologize for every review comment you get. It's
meant for improvements of results, not personal. :)
> I'll one-by-one re-send all the patches.
>
> However because most of my patches are new files,
> should I send-out the patches with detail change log?
>
> For example:
>
> [PATCH] dumb timer
> ... [PATCH v2 0/2] dumb timer (Cover letter)
> [PATCH v2 1/2] dumb timer (The one in Patch V1)
> [PATCH v2 2/2] dumb timer: coding style update (Change log for V2)
> ...... [PATCH v3 0/2] dumb timer (Cover letter)
> [PATCH v3 1/2] dumb timer (The merged file in Patch V1 & v2)
> [PATCH v3 2/2] dumb timer: bug fix (Change log for V3)
No, no, no. What you should do is just something like:
[PATCH v3 0/x] Add Faraday A36x SoC platform support
[PATCH v3 1/x] arm: Add Faraday A360 and A369 machines
[PATCH v3 2/x] faraday_a36x: Add FT... timer
...
* v3 cover letter contains a change log going back to v1.
* v3 is not a reply to v2 (no --in-reply-to). This aids a threaded mail
display for reviewing and avoids an old version getting reviewed or applied.
* 1+/x are replies to 0/x (usually automatically by git-send-email).
That helps keep the patches together and in the right order.
* Bug fixes of your own code do not go separate (only if you were fixing
existing code from qemu.git). There's no need to introduce bugs and then
to fix them.
* Adding a stub machine in 1/x has the advantage that the patch is much
smaller and easier to review than first adding all devices and then
adding a machine that uses all of them. And each device being added in
(1+n)/x can be tested (system not fully working of course). I.e., the
machine will grow in functionality patch by patch.
* Maybe you can order EHCI last due to the refactoring work involved?
To aid with the requested reordering and squashing of bug fixes into
patches, `git rebase -i` and `git checkout -p` may be of help to you.
Regards,
Andreas
--
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 9:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1359101996-11667-1-git-send-email-dantesu@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1359101996-11667-2-git-send-email-dantesu@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <510AC221.4040903@samsung.com>
[not found] ` <CAK65tU6e8LWaL1jwP1TskQ6O2jsgsef6mypY82pYyXZ+Uwdogw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-02-01 8:32 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 01/20] arm: add Faraday a36x SoC platform support Andreas Färber
2013-02-01 8:57 ` Kuo-Jung Su
2013-02-01 9:47 ` Andreas Färber [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=510B8F1A.6080404@suse.de \
--to=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=blauwirbel@gmail.com \
--cc=dantesu@faraday-tech.com \
--cc=dantesu@gmail.com \
--cc=fred.konrad@greensocs.com \
--cc=i.mitsyanko@samsung.com \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).