qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@redhat.com>
Cc: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages
Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2013 17:58:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <510BF434.1010308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130131094809.GO15004@redhat.com>

Il 31/01/2013 10:48, Gleb Natapov ha scritto:
>> Also I notice that the bottle neck in migrating unmapped pages is the detection of those pages
>> because we map the pages in order to check them, for a large guest this is very expensive as mapping a page
>> results in a page fault in the host.
>> So what will be very helpful is actually locating those pages without mapping them
>> which looks very complicated.
>>
> What is wrong with mincore()?

As Avi said, it returns false if the memory is in swap.

Note that while we do take a page fault, the recent kernel patch to
introduce a huge zero page might have reduced the cost in terms of both
clear_page and cache misses.

Paolo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-02-01 16:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <510A15DC.3070706@dlhnet.de>
     [not found] ` <510A218C.2000903@redhat.com>
     [not found]   ` <20130131094809.GO15004@redhat.com>
     [not found]     ` <510A47F1.6070302@redhat.com>
     [not found]       ` <CAEbWaipEYFLshmMxm3R+n=Kk+ya7+m0-B5K__2RqeMM_vex4SA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]         ` <20130131143043.GD23213@redhat.com>
     [not found]           ` <CAEbWaiqJ1pjaXeBtqf7Ww-KX8x7t+bvn6JzhPr8KbtA6ADBH1g@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]             ` <20130131144243.GE23213@redhat.com>
     [not found]               ` <CAEbWaio1SM3u=-_paMkU6sLK1SWih0_gUgMDQhJ-N37dTuX4=Q@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20130131211844.GC16941@redhat.com>
2013-02-01  7:30                   ` [Qemu-devel] RFC migration of zero pages Avi Kivity
2013-02-01 16:58     ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
     [not found]   ` <85C05B4E-E6BC-43D3-917F-E3EAC674F2EA@dlhnet.de>
     [not found]     ` <510A2C3D.3060001@redhat.com>
2013-02-01 17:03       ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-02-03  7:24         ` Peter Lieven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=510BF434.1010308@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=gleb@redhat.com \
    --cc=owasserm@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@dlhnet.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).