From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>, Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: use XBZRLE only after bulk stage
Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 14:53:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5130B2E0.6070401@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5130B29C.3060301@redhat.com>
Il 01/03/2013 14:52, Eric Blake ha scritto:
> On 03/01/2013 06:31 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
>> at the beginning of migration all pages are marked dirty and
>> in the first round a bulk migration of all pages is performed.
>>
>> currently all these pages are copied to the page cache regardless
>> if there are frequently updated or not. this doesn't make sense
>> since most of these pages are never transferred again.
>>
>> this patch changes the XBZRLE transfer to only be used after
>> the bulk stage has been completed. that means a page is added
>> to the page cache the second time it is transferred and XBZRLE
>> can benefit from the third time of transfer.
>>
>> since the page cache is likely smaller than the number of pages
>> its also likely that in the second round the page is missing in the
>> cache due to collisions in the bulk phase.
>>
>> on the other hand a lot of unneccssary mallocs, memdups and frees
>
> s/unneccssary/unnecessary/
>
>> are saved.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven <pl@kamp.de>
>
> Do you have any benchmark numbers? At any rate, the explanation seems
> sound, so a benchmark should show this.
It probably would be much less of a problem with the pending patches to
move RAM migration out of the big QEMU lock. However, the explanation
makes sense.
Paolo
>> ---
>> arch_init.c | 5 ++++-
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-01 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-01 13:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: use XBZRLE only after bulk stage Peter Lieven
2013-03-01 13:52 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-01 13:53 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-03-01 14:06 ` Peter Lieven
2013-03-01 14:08 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-01 14:13 ` Peter Lieven
2013-03-01 14:23 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-01 14:50 ` Peter Lieven
2013-03-01 16:04 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-04 17:10 ` Peter Lieven
2013-03-04 17:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-03-04 17:39 ` Peter Lieven
2013-03-04 18:51 ` Orit Wasserman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5130B2E0.6070401@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=owasserm@redhat.com \
--cc=pl@dlhnet.de \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).