From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:42477) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCZAG-0007ig-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:27:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCZAF-0006eA-Ul for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:27:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2834) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCZAF-0006e3-Mk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Mar 2013 12:27:03 -0500 Message-ID: <5134CA4A.7040700@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 04 Mar 2013 17:22:34 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] The state of testing List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Kevin Wolf , Anthony Liguori , Juan Quintela , Markus Armbruster , Michael Roth , qemu-devel , Amit Shah Hi, > How are things looking with device emulation, migration, monitor, char, etc? At the moment autotest/virt-test is pretty much the only workable thing for non-trivial devices because libqtest lacks infrastructure for pci and anything building on top of pci. usb has no in-tree tests, but has autotest coverage. chardevs have some autotest coverage, /me wrote a test for chardev-{add,remove} qmp commands. Still need to rebase + polish + submit that one though. Migration coverage is pretty bad overall I think. What is the state of the idl patch series btw? cheers, Gerd