From: Fabien Chouteau <chouteau@adacore.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>,
afaerber@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] target-arm: always set endian bits in big-endian mode
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 16:07:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51360A3D.2080302@adacore.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8CxMLX1uTeSxbwvu0HYzL93-qCJEBa6UtxC9d0Erpbaw@mail.gmail.com>
On 03/05/2013 01:33 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 March 2013 18:56, Fabien Chouteau <chouteau@adacore.com> wrote:
>> On 03/04/2013 02:24 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>>>> On 03/01/2013 09:58 PM, Paul Brook wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> This is wrong for all the CPUs QEMU crrently supports. SCTLR.IE is
>>>>> defined to be zero.
>>>>
>>>> Again I'd like to have more information. Why is it wrong to set IE when
>>>> we are in big-endian?
>
> It's wrong because you're setting IE for all v6 and v7 cores
> in bigendian mode, when IE is only valid for R profile cores.
>
Right, that's something I missed, SCTLR.IE is for R profiles only.
> To correctly emulate a bigendian v6/v7 non-R profile core you would
> need to arrange for the bswap_code flag to be set (which then causes
> us to re-byte-swap code accesses to undo the endianness flip that
> TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN would otherwise give us). I suspect that what
> you actually want is:
> * sctlr bit IE is read-only, and set to 0 or 1 according to the
> sctlr reset value defined for the CPU type
It's actually more of a board setting.
> * the bswap_code flag is set to 1 if TARGET_WORDS_BIGENDIAN &&
> SCTLR.IE == 0)
> but that's just off the top of my head so might be wrong.
>
If it's that simple (i.e. set the bswap_code flag) I can try to do it,
otherwise I'll just pass. My main interest here is cortex-R4.
>> Is it possible to have both data and instruction in BE8?
>
> Yes; this is precisely what SCTLR.IE enables.
OK good, that makes sense.
>> Since it is a legacy support, I would imagine that SCTLR.IE means BE32
>> access for instructions. Is that right?
>
> No. It is supporting legacy code; it is not itself a legacy feature.
> IE + BE8 (data) looks very very similar to BE32 from the point of view
> of code on the CPU; it is code that expects a BE32 kind of view of
> the world that is the legacy code being supported.
>
That's what I fail to understand, why IE + BE8 (data) gives a legacy
BE32 view?
>>> All the v7 cores QEMU currently supports[1] only implement BE8 mode. The IE
>>> bit is reserved and most be zero. Usermode emulation implements both, but the
>>> privileged cp15 registers can safely be ignored there.
>>>
>>
>> When I build my qemu-system-armeb, in what mode is it (BE8, BE32, data
>> and/or instruction in big-endian)?
>
> It will effectively behave kind of like a BE32 (word invariant, swaps
> both code and data) system; you won't be able to tell the difference
> between that and the BE8+SCTLR.IE system you're trying to emulate,
> except for accesses to word-width registers on device models.
> That needs thought to make sure the changes are actually coherent.
>
So the current behavior of qemu-system-armeb is BE8+IE, therefore not
compatible with any non R profile ARMv6/7.
Thanks,
--
Fabien Chouteau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-05 16:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-03-01 17:21 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/4] ARM: Misc ARM big-endian bug fixes Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-01 17:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/4] QAPI: Add ARMEB target-type Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-01 17:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/4] Add default config for armeb-softmmu Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-01 17:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/4] target-arm: Fix VFP register byte order in GDB remote Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-01 20:51 ` Paul Brook
2013-03-04 10:03 ` Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-04 13:30 ` Paul Brook
2013-03-04 17:31 ` Fabien Chouteau
[not found] ` <201303042334.02147.paul@codesourcery.com>
2013-03-05 10:59 ` Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-01 17:21 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/4] target-arm: always set endian bits in big-endian mode Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-01 20:58 ` Paul Brook
2013-03-04 10:30 ` Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-04 13:24 ` Paul Brook
2013-03-05 10:56 ` Fabien Chouteau
2013-03-05 12:33 ` Peter Maydell
2013-03-05 15:07 ` Fabien Chouteau [this message]
2013-03-05 23:08 ` Peter Maydell
2013-03-06 17:39 ` Fabien Chouteau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51360A3D.2080302@adacore.com \
--to=chouteau@adacore.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=paul@codesourcery.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).