From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37341) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCuIe-0001pz-Ic for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:01:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCuId-0001Xd-1X for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:01:08 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8863) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UCuIc-0001XS-NJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 11:01:06 -0500 Message-ID: <513616B9.9090300@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 17:00:57 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1362495898-15352-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1362498663.9810.196.camel@i7.infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <1362498663.9810.196.camel@i7.infradead.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/3] Implement x86 soft reset List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: David Woodhouse Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 05/03/2013 16:51, David Woodhouse ha scritto: > On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 16:04 +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> This series makes various devices (port 92h, pckbd and the >> PIIX4/ICH9 southbridges) implement x86 soft reset correctly. > > How about suspend/resume? > > If you apply my patch which "fixes" the hard reset for i440FX to > actually reset the PAM configuration, will it no longer "break" > suspend/resume? Hmm, I forgot about that issue. It needs a trivial follow-up patch, I'll send it as patch 4/3. > (I think even my three cleanup patches for i440fx still haven't been > pulled, have they? :( ) No. Michael, can you look at David's "[PATCH 0/3] piix_pci cleanups"? I just sent a ping. Paolo