From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NJ9A6-0008F8-2P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:14 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1NJ9A2-0008D5-6b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:13 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=37754 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NJ9A1-0008Cn-Ts
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:09 -0500
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46983)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <ykamay@redhat.com>) id 1NJ9A1-0006kn-Ey
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:20:09 -0500
Date: Fri, 11 Dec 2009 12:07:21 -0500 (EST)
From: Yaniv Kamay <ykamay@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <513617265.1569661260551241991.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <232864779.1569611260551125791.JavaMail.root@zmail05.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Spice project is now open
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org


----- "Anthony Liguori" <anthony@codemonkey.ws> wrote:

> > I'm not getting into this discussion and is not going to happen, you
> have all
> > the necessary information on spiec-space.org in order to take
> intelligent
> > decision. The QEMU community can choose to reject Spice if it decide
> to do so.
> >   
> 
> There's nothing to reject.  You haven't posted patches.
> 
> When you do post patches, if you can't/won't offer an explanation as
> to 
> why it's better than what we already have, then they will be
> rejected.


Now I'm really scare.


> 
> Regards,
> 
> Anthony Liguori