From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54802) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF2XE-0002kp-Qm for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:13:05 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF2X7-0001NG-V9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:13:00 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:22519) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UF2X7-0001N3-LL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 11 Mar 2013 09:12:53 -0400 Message-ID: <513DD849.2070101@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 14:12:41 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1363000640-13398-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <513DC5FA.30205@redhat.com> <513DD1B5.7040906@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Peter Crosthwaite , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de, agraf@suse.de Il 11/03/2013 14:08, Peter Maydell ha scritto: >>>> >>> These are little more than SoC containers, aren't they? >>> >> >>> >> They're container devices, yes. But why should container devices >>> >> go under hw/$ARCH ? >> > >> > Because they don't really implement any logic, ideally a board should be >> > a little more than a bunch of container devices. > This is an argument for putting boards in the same place as > container devices (which I would agree with), not for putting > container devices in the same place we currently put boards > (which I would disagree with). True. Still, hw/ARCH is a pretty decent place for boards (and in fact it was part of "part 1" because it was more or less agreed-upon). Paolo