From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:39010)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UFJij-0002z2-DS
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 03:34:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UFJii-0005Ft-E3
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 03:34:01 -0400
Received: from mail-we0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c03::229]:43338)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UFJii-0005Fk-6v
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 03:34:00 -0400
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so4473666wey.0
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 00:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <513EDA61.8020801@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 08:33:53 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1363000640-13398-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<513ECFCB.1080101@twiddle.net>
In-Reply-To: <513ECFCB.1080101@twiddle.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Proposal for hw/ split
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Cc: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@petalogix.com>, peter.maydell@linaro.org, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de

Il 12/03/2013 07:48, Richard Henderson ha scritto:
> On 2013-03-11 04:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> == hw/pci ==
>> hw/alpha_typhoon.c                           hw/pci/host-typhoon.c
> 
> Why wouldn't this go into hw/alpha/, really?

Sure.  I think the Alpha-specific interrupt delivery parts should be
separated into hw/alpha, like hw/cris/pic_cpu.c, and passed to the
device via GPIO pins.  And after doing some parts could go in hw/pci and
others could go in hw/intc.  The emulation is quite shallow, so I
couldn't really find a place for it.

Peter said he wants few or no devices in hw/arm/, so I proceeded in that
direction, but cases like this are when I'm totally okay with giving
maintainers all the leeway they want.  I'll move this one back to hw/alpha/.

Paolo