qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Peter Lieven <pl@dlhnet.de>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
	Orit Wasserman <owasserm@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 4/9] buffer_is_zero: use vector optimizations if possible
Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:09:35 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <513F533F.1010605@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B3045697-71E3-4203-B575-44BC1F7E73AB@dlhnet.de>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 708 bytes --]

On 03/12/2013 10:03 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:

>>> +    if (((uintptr_t) buf) % sizeof(VECTYPE) == 0
>>> +          && len % 8*sizeof(VECTYPE) == 0) {
>>
>> Space around binary operators.  Use CHAR_BITS instead of a magic number
>> 8.

> the 8 is not BITS_PER_BYTE or CHAR_BITS its the number of
> vectors in one loop in buffer_find_nonzero_offset(). I will add
> a constant for this to make it clearer.

Indeed, now I see it - 8 is the unroll factor.  Well, all the more
evidence that a named constant makes the code easier to read, compared
to me mis-interpreting the magic number.

-- 
Eric Blake   eblake redhat com    +1-919-301-3266
Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 621 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2013-03-12 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-12 15:50 [Qemu-devel] [RFC][PATCH 4/9] buffer_is_zero: use vector optimizations if possible Peter Lieven
2013-03-12 16:01 ` Eric Blake
2013-03-12 16:03   ` Peter Lieven
2013-03-12 16:09     ` Eric Blake [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=513F533F.1010605@redhat.com \
    --to=eblake@redhat.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=owasserm@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pl@dlhnet.de \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).