From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, quintela@redhat.com,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com,
pbonzini@redhat.com, dietmar@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 07/10] snapshot: qmp use new internal API for external snapshot transaction
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:08:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <51415B52.1040409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130313101838.GD2309@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>
于 2013-3-13 18:18, Kevin Wolf 写道:
> Am 12.03.2013 um 09:30 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
>> I redesigned the structure, Following is the fake code:
>>
>> typedef struct BdrvActionOps {
>> /* check the request's validation, allocate p_opaque if needed */
>> int (*check)(BlockdevAction *action, void **p_opaque, Error **errp);
>> /* take the action */
>> int (*submit)(BlockdevAction *action, void *opaque, Error **errp);
>> /* update emulator */
>> int (*commit)(BlockdevAction *action, void *opaque, Error **errp);
>> /* cancel the action */
>> int (*rollback)(BlockdevAction *action, void *opaque, Error **errp);
>> } BdrvActionOps;
>
> Why do you need the split of prepare into check/submit?
>
> If you have prepare/commit/abort, everybody will recognise this as the
> standard transaction pattern because this is just how it's done.
> Deviating from it needs a good justification in my opinion.
>
> Kevin
>
My thought is rejecting the request in *check if parameter invalid
before take any action, while submit do the real action, to reduce
the chance to of rolling back when some request not valid in the batch.
--
Best Regards
Wenchao Xia
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-03-14 5:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-07 7:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 00/10] snapshot: take block snapshots in unified way Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 01/10] block: export function bdrv_find_snapshot() Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 02/10] block: add function deappend() Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 03/10] error: add function error_set_check() Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 04/10] oslib-win32: add lock for time functions Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 17:12 ` Stefan Weil
2013-01-08 2:27 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 05/10] snapshot: design of internal common API to take snapshots Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 06/10] snapshot: implemention " Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 07/10] snapshot: qmp use new internal API for external snapshot transaction Wenchao Xia
2013-01-09 12:44 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-10 3:21 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-10 12:41 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-11 6:22 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-11 9:12 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-14 2:56 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-14 10:06 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-15 7:03 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-03-12 8:30 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-03-12 15:43 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-03-13 1:36 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-03-13 8:42 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-03-13 10:18 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-03-14 5:08 ` Wenchao Xia [this message]
2013-03-14 8:22 ` Kevin Wolf
2013-03-18 10:00 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 08/10] snapshot: qmp add internal snapshot transaction interface Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 09/10] snapshot: qmp add blockdev-snapshot-internal-sync interface Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 10/10] snapshot: hmp add internal snapshot support for block device Wenchao Xia
2013-01-09 22:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 00/10] snapshot: take block snapshots in unified way Eric Blake
2013-01-10 6:01 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-11 13:56 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-01-14 2:09 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-14 10:08 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=51415B52.1040409@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).