qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Wenchao Xia <xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, quintela@redhat.com,
	Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, dietmar@proxmox.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 07/10] snapshot: qmp use new internal API for external snapshot transaction
Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2013 13:08:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <51415B52.1040409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130313101838.GD2309@dhcp-200-207.str.redhat.com>

于 2013-3-13 18:18, Kevin Wolf 写道:
> Am 12.03.2013 um 09:30 hat Wenchao Xia geschrieben:
>>    I redesigned the structure, Following is the fake code:
>>
>> typedef struct BdrvActionOps {
>>      /* check the request's validation, allocate p_opaque if needed */
>>      int (*check)(BlockdevAction *action, void **p_opaque, Error **errp);
>>      /* take the action */
>>      int (*submit)(BlockdevAction *action, void *opaque, Error **errp);
>>      /* update emulator */
>>      int (*commit)(BlockdevAction *action, void *opaque, Error **errp);
>>      /* cancel the action */
>>      int (*rollback)(BlockdevAction *action, void *opaque, Error **errp);
>> } BdrvActionOps;
>
> Why do you need the split of prepare into check/submit?
>
> If you have prepare/commit/abort, everybody will recognise this as the
> standard transaction pattern because this is just how it's done.
> Deviating from it needs a good justification in my opinion.
>
> Kevin
>

   My thought is rejecting the request in *check if parameter invalid
before take any action, while submit do the real action, to reduce
the chance to of rolling back when some request not valid in the batch.

-- 
Best Regards

Wenchao Xia

  reply	other threads:[~2013-03-14  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-01-07  7:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 00/10] snapshot: take block snapshots in unified way Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 01/10] block: export function bdrv_find_snapshot() Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 02/10] block: add function deappend() Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 03/10] error: add function error_set_check() Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 04/10] oslib-win32: add lock for time functions Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07 17:12   ` Stefan Weil
2013-01-08  2:27     ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 05/10] snapshot: design of internal common API to take snapshots Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 06/10] snapshot: implemention " Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 07/10] snapshot: qmp use new internal API for external snapshot transaction Wenchao Xia
2013-01-09 12:44   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-10  3:21     ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-10 12:41       ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-11  6:22         ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-11  9:12           ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-14  2:56             ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-14 10:06               ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-01-15  7:03                 ` Wenchao Xia
2013-03-12  8:30                   ` Wenchao Xia
2013-03-12 15:43                     ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-03-13  1:36                       ` Wenchao Xia
2013-03-13  8:42                         ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-03-13 10:18                     ` Kevin Wolf
2013-03-14  5:08                       ` Wenchao Xia [this message]
2013-03-14  8:22                         ` Kevin Wolf
2013-03-18 10:00                           ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 08/10] snapshot: qmp add internal snapshot transaction interface Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 09/10] snapshot: qmp add blockdev-snapshot-internal-sync interface Wenchao Xia
2013-01-07  7:28 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 10/10] snapshot: hmp add internal snapshot support for block device Wenchao Xia
2013-01-09 22:34 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 00/10] snapshot: take block snapshots in unified way Eric Blake
2013-01-10  6:01   ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-11 13:56     ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-01-14  2:09       ` Wenchao Xia
2013-01-14 10:08         ` Stefan Hajnoczi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=51415B52.1040409@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=xiawenc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=dietmar@proxmox.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=quintela@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).