From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59323) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHec1-0005NZ-6J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:16:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHec0-0002sy-2O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:16:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:38308) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UHebz-0002su-Qo for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 14:16:43 -0400 Message-ID: <51475A00.8070304@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 19:16:32 +0100 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1363628125-5310-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <5147572E.8040501@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/35] hw/ reorganization, part 2 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Richard Henderson , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= Il 18/03/2013 19:11, Peter Maydell ha scritto: > > So what is the better alternative? A new hw/container/? > > Maybe. Whatever it is, it should be a classification by kind > of device, so we can consistently sort by kind of device > and not part by kind of device and part by target architecture. > > Personally I have no issues with the existing 'all in hw/' > arrangement; I just want you to come up with a consistent > structure if you're going to try to change it. Shouldn't these containers also host the CPU device(s), rather than the boards? And create them according to the num-cpu property? If so, they would have to go in hw/arm. Andreas, what do you think? Paolo