From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35657)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UHgJU-00030Y-Av
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:05:45 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UHgJT-0003qH-8g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:05:44 -0400
Received: from mail-bk0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4008:c01::22b]:64568)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>) id 1UHgJT-0003q5-1u
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 16:05:43 -0400
Received: by mail-bk0-f43.google.com with SMTP id jm19so2690025bkc.16
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Mon, 18 Mar 2013 13:05:41 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: Paolo Bonzini <paolo.bonzini@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5147738F.7070803@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 21:05:35 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1363628125-5310-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8yVrVSBLer45F_2kwmxHeKEBnO3ux9foU80YgAWd3f9w@mail.gmail.com>
	<5147572E.8040501@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA9PYeXnpr1Lykurgr64A1EL+zNod7us-2RZYCOBTxjGYg@mail.gmail.com>
	<51475A00.8070304@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_Uo8Puzx3DcyjeZzqpnXV9PU1Qn3_E4REOou6pTiJaEw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_Uo8Puzx3DcyjeZzqpnXV9PU1Qn3_E4REOou6pTiJaEw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/35] hw/ reorganization, part 2
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.iglesias@gmail.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= <afaerber@suse.de>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

Il 18/03/2013 19:17, Peter Maydell ha scritto:
>> > Shouldn't these containers also host the CPU device(s), rather than the
>> > boards?  And create them according to the num-cpu property?  If so, they
>> > would have to go in hw/arm.
> Yes, ideally they should have the CPU devices in them too.
> Remind me why devices which instantiate the CPU device go
> in hw/arm ?

Because they refer to ARMCPU/CPUARMState.

Paolo