From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37784)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UIetu-0005CE-1Z
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:47:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UIets-0004NI-Qj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:47:21 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41153)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UIets-0004N9-JM
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 08:47:20 -0400
Message-ID: <514B0152.10005@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 13:47:14 +0100
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <cover.1363633627.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<ff3eb77fc8260e634941cef66e7aa754ae9f91ee.1363633627.git.mst@redhat.com>
	<514AFC4E.4070804@redhat.com> <20130321123044.GA32484@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130321123044.GA32484@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v9 2/3] qom: call class destructor before
	unparent
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, libvir-list@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, afaerber@suse.de

Il 21/03/2013 13:30, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 01:25:50PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 21/03/2013 13:07, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> > > Make sure object is valid when destructor is called.
> > 
> > "Make sure the object still has a canonical path while the unparent
> > callback is running".
> > 
> > Otherwise, the series looks good.
> > 
> 
> Worth respinning for?

If it goes through the pci branch, of course not but still make the
change.  Otherwise, probably not.

Paolo