From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49233) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULc3K-00028y-DL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:21:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULc3J-0003XT-IL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:21:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30906) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ULc3J-0003XI-Ai for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:21:17 -0400 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r2TGLGHX019105 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Fri, 29 Mar 2013 12:21:16 -0400 Message-ID: <5155BF79.3040207@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:21:13 +0100 From: Pavel Hrdina MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5155BD63.40905@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5155BD63.40905@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 07/11] qapi: Convert savevm List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eric Blake Cc: armbru@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, lcapitulino@redhat.com On 29.3.2013 17:12, Eric Blake wrote: > On 03/29/2013 08:12 AM, Pavel Hrdina wrote: >> QMP command "vm-snapshot-save" has also extra optional force parameter >> to specify whether replace existing snapshot or not. It also returns >> information about created snapshot. >> >> Signed-off-by: Pavel Hrdina >> --- >> hmp-commands.hx | 4 ++-- >> hmp.c | 11 +++++++++ >> hmp.h | 1 + >> include/sysemu/sysemu.h | 1 - >> qapi-schema.json | 22 ++++++++++++++++++ >> qmp-commands.hx | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> savevm.c | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ >> 7 files changed, 118 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) > > Reviewed-by: Eric Blake > > Rest of series already has my review from earlier versions, so I only > gave them a cursory glance this time around, but assume they are still okay. > Thanks a lot for your reviews, Pavel