From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:49663)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1UNMv1-0000v2-3S
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:36:00 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1UNMuw-0000Dh-GE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:35:59 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35085)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kraxel@redhat.com>) id 1UNMuv-0000CS-T0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 08:35:54 -0400
Message-ID: <515C2222.8080804@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 14:35:46 +0200
From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1363701863-13004-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com>
	<1ba01d1f676845e458dba25a096bd1fa.squirrel@ssl.dlhnet.de>
In-Reply-To: <1ba01d1f676845e458dba25a096bd1fa.squirrel@ssl.dlhnet.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] fix monitor
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Lieven <lieven-lists@dlhnet.de>
Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, anthony@codemonkey.ws, Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>

On 04/03/13 14:17, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Hi Gerd,
> 
> I today saw this assert when live migrating a VM. Is this related? The
> below patch was already applied.
> 
> qemu-1.4.5: /usr/src/qemu-1.4.5/monitor.c:297: monitor_puts: Assertion
> `mon->outbuf_index < sizeof(mon->outbuf) - 1' failed.

Probably, patches (from luiz) are on the list to make the monitor buffer
size dynamic, they should fix it.

cheers,
  Gerd