From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNO1d-0002xG-93 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:47:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNO1W-0000Kh-Fx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:46:53 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:35590) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UNO1W-0000KX-7w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 09:46:46 -0400 Message-ID: <515C3345.50006@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2013 15:48:53 +0200 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1363717469-30980-1-git-send-email-peter.maydell@linaro.org> <87y5dh2o3j.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <87vc8jdxmo.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> In-Reply-To: <87vc8jdxmo.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Use of flash for x86 BIOS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: Peter Maydell , Anthony Liguori , Juan Quintela , jordan.l.justen@intel.com, patches@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Xiao Guangrong , Jordan Justen On 03/22/13 20:48, Markus Armbruster wrote: > Jordan Justen writes: >>> 1. The "pc-sysfw" device is mostly harmless. >> >> Indeed, and it's only marginally of interest until kvm supports it. >> >> Admittedly, I've been completely ineffectual in resolving the kvm >> portion. More recently I tried to make use of KVM_MEM_READONLY to >> address this. I was able to get an VM exit on writes to flash, but not >> able to get the memory region to convert to full device mode so VM >> exits would occur on reads as well. I am once again stalled... > > Have you discussed your difficulties on kvm@vger.kernel.org? The most recent discussion that I'm aware of was: http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-01/msg05150.html http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-01/msg05236.html (both are sub-threads under the same patch submission). Laszlo