From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41578)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1UPuGM-0000YF-L1
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:36:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1UPuGI-0005Ev-Qq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:36:30 -0400
Received: from e9.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.139]:33273)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1UPuGI-0005Eq-Mx
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:36:26 -0400
Received: from /spool/local
	by e9.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only!
	Violators will be prosecuted
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> from <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
	Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:36:26 -0400
Received: from d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (d01relay06.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.116])
	by d01dlp03.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AC3C90049
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:36:23 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (d01av01.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.215])
	by d01relay06.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
	r3ACaNvT29098080
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:36:23 -0400
Received: from d01av01.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1])
	by d01av01.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
	r3ACaMtk020758
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:36:22 -0400
Message-ID: <51655CC2.5060101@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 08:36:18 -0400
From: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1365568180-19593-1-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<1365568180-19593-8-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<51651915.6080008@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <51651915.6080008@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH RDMA support v6: 7/7] introduce
	qemu_ram_foreach_block()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, owasserm@redhat.com, abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com, gokul@us.ibm.com

On 04/10/2013 03:47 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 10/04/2013 06:29, mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com ha scritto:
>> From: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@us.ibm.com>
>>
>> This is used during RDMA initialization in order to transmit
>> a description of all the RAM blocks to the peer for later
>> dynamic chunk registration purposes.
> why did you move this after patch 5???
>
> Paolo
>

Was just trying to be nice and move the less significant patch
to the end of the series, but I'm happy to move it back.