From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52695) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPuqP-0001n0-NR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:13:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPuqO-00017z-MR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:13:45 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45726) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UPuqO-00017k-EZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:13:44 -0400 Message-ID: <51656572.9010102@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:13:22 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1365568180-19593-1-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1365568180-19593-5-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <516519CA.4090809@redhat.com> <51655C62.2030508@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51655DB4.3070600@redhat.com> <516564D6.7040006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <516564D6.7040006@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH RDMA support v6: 4/7] Introduce two new capabilities List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael R. Hines" Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, owasserm@redhat.com, abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com, gokul@us.ibm.com Il 10/04/2013 15:10, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: > > > Also about qemu_ram_foreach_block: Why does this depend on patch 5, > exactly? It's patch 5 that depends on qemu_ram_foreach_block. I'm not sure how it is possible to link patch 5 if exec.c still does not provide qemu_ram_foreach_block. Paolo > qemu_ram_foreach_block is not conditionalized by anything.