From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33990) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQH8y-0003pg-Ug for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:02:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQH8w-0003bM-VR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:02:24 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47547) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQH8w-0003b7-OX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:02:22 -0400 Message-ID: <5166ACC8.90505@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2013 06:30:00 -0600 From: Eric Blake MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1365632901-15470-1-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1365632901-15470-11-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51661F48.3070303@redhat.com> <51662249.20205@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51666BB2.80508@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51666BB2.80508@redhat.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="----enig2WENAKXRAEQOHPPWRGQOG" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH RDMA support v1: 10/13] introduce new command migrate_check_for_zero List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Orit Wasserman Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael R. Hines" , abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com, gokul@us.ibm.com, pbonzini@redhat.com This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) ------enig2WENAKXRAEQOHPPWRGQOG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/11/2013 01:52 AM, Orit Wasserman wrote: > On 04/11/2013 05:39 AM, Michael R. Hines wrote: >> On 04/10/2013 10:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> >>> New QMP commands should be named with '-' rather than '_', as in >>> 'migrate-check-for-zero'. >>> >>> Why do we need a new command, instead of adding a new capability to t= he >>> already-existing capability command? >>> >> >> Orit told me to convert the capability to a command =3D) >> (It was originally a capability) >> >> > I prefer it a command because it is not related directly to RDMA I can > see it used in regular live migration too. But how is a new command any different than a new capability? Both can be used in regular live migration, and for all intents and purposes, it feels like a capability. --=20 Eric Blake eblake redhat com +1-919-301-3266 Libvirt virtualization library http://libvirt.org ------enig2WENAKXRAEQOHPPWRGQOG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Public key at http://people.redhat.com/eblake/eblake.gpg Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJRZqzIAAoJEKeha0olJ0NqMi0H/0PmHLmDtWlYRXkpNhUC//m9 8SxTbMijhxhXajuTeljRjC0u3qSy6l5hIgd8ami2IUWJh3rXBVh92r93CyiGCzzo IxiFkQV80ny/EJoWLTBv64Vll65MkW2uexuNh+zN/HPvQWJ6CwuzYo+AoJZgPKvA z/PFj65D6xaC+psockefoQslYldS8ZKLIiLgbNPfTKktsqXHLj0oA+I5IVfkysqc cQJv+p7ItvEHs+PeMDJFbpse0w9yomSUQ7aDccWGL7UZtkJwhMG4WLmPvecpJBQO Ft/s1nVgSvcYk2gEKLltwWxci31K6viXcozJ+paNqoyMRLdQ/NhPAEKMdBFoLxo= =8om6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------enig2WENAKXRAEQOHPPWRGQOG--