From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35334)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UQbbp-0007Xi-Kq
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 06:53:34 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UQbbo-0002lU-Bs
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 06:53:33 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50224)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UQbbo-0002lN-4b
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 06:53:32 -0400
Message-ID: <5167E797.2050103@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:53:11 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20130411071927.GA17063@redhat.com>
	<5166B6B1.2030003@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130411134820.GA24942@redhat.com>
	<5166C19A.1040402@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130411143718.GC24942@redhat.com> <5166CDAD.8060807@redhat.com>
	<20130411145632.GA2280@redhat.com>
	<5166F7AE.8070209@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130411191533.GA25515@redhat.com>
	<51671DFF.80904@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20130412104802.GA23467@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130412104802.GA23467@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH RDMA support v5: 03/12] comprehensive
 protocol documentation
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, owasserm@redhat.com, abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com, gokul@us.ibm.com

Il 12/04/2013 12:48, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
> 1.  You have two protocols already and this does not make sense in
> version 1 of the patch.

It makes sense if we consider it experimental (add x- in front of
transport and capability) and would like people to play with it.

Paolo