From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50840) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQeM7-00064e-TK for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:49:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQeM1-0001Lu-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:49:31 -0400 Received: from e8.ny.us.ibm.com ([32.97.182.138]:37150) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQeM1-0001Lo-Ik for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:49:25 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e8.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:49:24 -0400 Received: from d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (d01relay03.pok.ibm.com [9.56.227.235]) by d01dlp02.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB5716E804F for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:49:17 -0400 (EDT) Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (d01av05.pok.ibm.com [9.56.224.195]) by d01relay03.pok.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r3CDnKgS299386 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:49:20 -0400 Received: from d01av05.pok.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d01av05.pok.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r3CDnJ8K029084 for ; Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:49:19 -0400 Message-ID: <516810DF.9050407@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2013 09:49:19 -0400 From: "Michael R. Hines" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1365745929-24871-3-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5167EBB5.4010005@redhat.com> <51680C1D.9050803@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <51680EF5.2010509@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51680EF5.2010509@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/8] rdma: core rdma logic List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, mst@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, owasserm@redhat.com, abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com, gokul@us.ibm.com On 04/12/2013 09:41 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 12/04/2013 15:29, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: >> Oh, thank you. Huge bug - I need to introduce a "COMPRESS" >> message for this page into the protocol just like we already have >> for TCP and bypass the current chunk. > It's okay to send the page uncompressed if it's been registered already. > This way you skip most is_zero_page checks after the bulk phase. I > just care that a page is never registered if it is zero and never changes. > > Paolo Acknowledged.