From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38934) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URh71-0006JN-Od for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:58:18 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URh6y-0001wB-Kf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:58:15 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36662) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1URh6y-0001vp-Cf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:58:12 -0400 Received: from int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r3FAwBWf028486 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 06:58:11 -0400 Message-ID: <516BDDCA.6010707@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 13:00:26 +0200 From: Laszlo Ersek MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <5899f1a3f5671520e17a6a3779c6defa5ae4a6e9.1366018642.git.mst@redhat.com> <516BD9A4.2050307@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <516BD9A4.2050307@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] acpi: move declarations from pc.h to acpi.h List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Cc: Paolo Bonzini , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 04/15/13 12:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > Il 15/04/2013 11:37, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto: >> +/* acpi.c */ >> +extern int acpi_enabled; >> +extern char unsigned *acpi_tables; >> +extern size_t acpi_tables_len; >> + >> +void acpi_table_install(const char unsigned *blob, size_t bloblen, >> + bool has_header, const struct AcpiTableOptions *hdrs, >> + Error **errp); > > This function is static, I've fixed it up and will include it in the hw/ > fixups pull request. > > I picked up patch 3 as well, I'll leave 2 to Laszlo. > > Paolo > >> +void acpi_table_add(const QemuOpts *opts, Error **errp); Doesn't this series conflict with my pending ? Thanks Laszlo