From: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 0/5] console: qom-ify & extent screendump monitor command
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 09:19:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5174E487.6000200@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5170129A.8010807@redhat.com>
On 04/18/13 17:34, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 04/18/2013 09:21 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote:
>>>> Question for the libvirt guys: Is it ok for libvirt to just extend the
>>>> existing screendump command? Can libvirt figure there is a new
>>>> (optional) parameter? See patch #5.
>>>
>
>>> So yes, I think libvirt will be able to drive the new command by knowing
>>> how many heads appear per device, then passing in the appropriate named
>>> device to the QMP command. And yes, I'll review patch 5 regarding
>>> interface design.
>>
>> We can extend screendump on HMP, but the general rule for QMP is to add a
>> new command instead so that clients don't have to play tricks like Eric is
>> suggesting :)
Ahem. It didn't sound like libvirt plays tricks there, to me it simply
looked like an description of how libvirt manages devices + heads and
the confirmation that libvirt indeed know which device it wants a
screenshot from.
We also have to care to not mix up two things: #1 is whenever we'll go
extent screendump or add screendump2 (see sub-thread started by markus
reply). #2 the actual design of the new/extended command.
> The problem at hand is that your proposal in patch 5:
>
> -{ 'command': 'screendump', 'data': {'filename': 'str'} }
> +{ 'command': 'screendump', 'data': {'filename': 'str',
> + '*device' : 'str'} }
>
> still doesn't support the case of dumping just one head of a multi-head
> device.
qxl is the only device with multihead support, and it works by defining
a large framebuffer and defining the heads as rectangles within this
framebuffer:
+-------------------------------------------+
| framebuffer |
| +-------------+ +----------+ |
| | head 1 | | head 2 | |
| | | | | |
| +-------------+ +----------+ |
+-------------------------------------------+
(in practice you wouldn't have unused space around the heads of course,
but it's easier to draw this way ;)
So a recent spice client will get the head configuration info, then open
two windows, one for each head. A old spice client without multihead
support will create a single window covering the whole framebuffer
instead. Asking qemu to screendump a multihead qxl device will likewise
write out a dump of the whole framebuffer, i.e. the dump will have *all*
heads.
> device selection. Libvirt uses query-commands to determine whether new
So query-commands doesn't list the arguments supported by a command,
only the commands themself.
> Option 2 is probably slightly nicer for guaranteeing a sane error
> message back to the user, but option 1 (the approach of this series)
> still seems workable.
Sane error messaging is good, I'd still prefer Option 1 though, to get
both we'll need a new query-arguments command I guess ...
cheers,
Gerd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 9:01 [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 0/5] console: qom-ify & extent screendump monitor command Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-18 9:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] console: qom-ify QemuConsole Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-18 9:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] console: Hook QemuConsoles into qom tree Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-18 9:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] console: add device link to QemuConsoles Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-18 9:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] console: add qemu_console_lookup_by_device Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-18 9:01 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] console: extend screendump monitor cmd Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-18 12:10 ` [Qemu-devel] [RfC PATCH 0/5] console: qom-ify & extent screendump monitor command Eric Blake
2013-04-18 15:21 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-04-18 15:34 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-22 7:19 ` Gerd Hoffmann [this message]
2013-04-19 8:37 ` Markus Armbruster
2013-04-19 13:03 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-22 6:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-22 9:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-22 12:50 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-04-22 13:00 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-22 16:49 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-04-22 17:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2013-04-22 17:23 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-23 5:15 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-22 17:56 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-04-23 11:57 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2013-04-25 20:55 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-04-25 21:17 ` Luiz Capitulino
2013-04-25 21:55 ` Eric Blake
2013-04-25 22:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-04-25 22:19 ` Anthony Liguori
2013-04-26 0:41 ` Luiz Capitulino
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5174E487.6000200@redhat.com \
--to=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).