From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Fedorov Sergey <s.fedorov@samsung.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>,
aliguori@us.ibm.com, a.basov@samsung.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net/hub: remove can_receive handler
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:09:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5175609F.5030204@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <517556D9.2080809@samsung.com>
Il 22/04/2013 17:27, Fedorov Sergey ha scritto:
>
> E.g. network hub has 3 ports. Suppose when iterating through port list
> in net_hub_port_can_receive() a packet is successfully delivered to the
> first port, and then is queued in the source port queue because the
> second port cannot receive packets. Later net_hub_flush() will flush the
> packet from the source port queue and it will be delivered in every
> port. But it had been already delivered to one of them. So it will be
> delivered twice to some ports. Moreover there is less chance to dequeue
> the packet if several clients can't receive periodically.
Perhaps it is indeed wrong to do this blocking in can_receive()...
You're right that a hubport can always receive, but the hub itself
should have a queue. If one port cannot receive, the packet should be
appended to the hub's queue. And net_hub_flush will just go through the
hub's queue.
> Anyway, actually there is no need in net_hub_port_can_receive() as the
> network hub can always receive packets and pass it to its port network
> clients with qemu_send_packet(). I think it's more natural solution.
I think the point was to keep dumps in sync with what actually happened
on the other ports. Otherwise a "-net dump" port will show the packet
immediately, even though it hasn't been delivered yet.
Paolo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 16:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 11:31 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] net/hub: remove can_receive handler Sergey Fedorov
2013-04-22 11:47 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-22 12:26 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-04-22 14:57 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-22 15:27 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-04-22 16:09 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2013-04-23 7:27 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-04-23 6:58 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-23 7:41 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-04-23 12:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-23 13:14 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-10-21 11:44 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-10-21 11:52 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-10-28 7:26 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-10-29 14:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-10-30 10:29 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-10-30 12:55 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-23 9:32 ` Fedorov Sergey
2013-04-23 11:48 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-23 11:58 ` Fedorov Sergey
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5175609F.5030204@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=a.basov@samsung.com \
--cc=aliguori@us.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=s.fedorov@samsung.com \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).