From: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, "Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@gmail.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>,
"Richard Henderson" <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] [PATCH] configure: Undefine _FORTIFY_SOURCE prior using it
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 19:18:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5176C26D.9050508@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <51127222.1040904@redhat.com>
On 06.02.2013 16:09, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 06/02/2013 15:49, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
>>>> I don't think that's necessary. The 2nd level is the highest one [1] or [2].
>>>> It seems like in my case it's compiler who's defining the macro:
>>>>
>>>> $ echo "int main() {return 0;}" | gcc -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -x c -
>>>> <command-line>:0:0: warning: "_FORTIFY_SOURCE" redefined [enabled by default]
>>>> <stdin>:1:0: note: this is the location of the previous definition
>>>>
>>>> in which case we must undefine it. However, if the _FORTIFY_SOURCE is
>>>> defined by environment, I think we should not override it. So maybe need
>>>> a different approach. Anyway, with current state I cannot compile. I am using
>>>> gcc version 4.7.2 (Gentoo 4.7.2 p1.3, pie-0.5.5)
>> It would be nice to fix this for QEMU 1.4 but my gcc FORTIFY_SOURCE foo
>> is not strong enough to know what the best approach is here.
>>
>> Reviews from anyone else?
>
> I would prefer to avoid having _FORTIFY_SOURCE completely, and let
> distros do it. Alternatively, tie it to a new --enable switch which
> would do -U -D.
>
> But if there is a real problem for 1.4 the patch looks good.
>
> Paolo
>
Sorry for resurrecting such old thread, but what's the conclusion then?
I keep hitting this problem and I am tired of having one single patch on
the top of HEAD. And I bet others ran into this as well.
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-23 17:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9021f2f9e51e4c7a253d1993ea05f87d0718752f.1359627279.git.mprivozn@redhat.com>
2013-02-01 9:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] configure: Undefine _FORTIFY_SOURCE prior using it Andreas Färber
2013-02-01 15:18 ` Michal Privoznik
[not found] ` <20130206144956.GA22233@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <51127222.1040904@redhat.com>
2013-04-23 17:18 ` Michal Privoznik [this message]
2013-04-24 10:00 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-trivial] " Markus Armbruster
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5176C26D.9050508@redhat.com \
--to=mprivozn@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).