From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41621) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUje8-0001Ig-V3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:17:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUje5-0001xy-3p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:17:00 -0400 Received: from e34.co.us.ibm.com ([32.97.110.152]:60297) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUje4-0001xT-T0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:16:57 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e34.co.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:16:53 -0600 Received: from d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.228]) by d03dlp01.boulder.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE4A1FF0046 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:11:31 -0600 (MDT) Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (d03av03.boulder.ibm.com [9.17.195.169]) by d03relay03.boulder.ibm.com (8.13.8/8.13.8/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id r3NKGVYZ023150 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:16:32 -0600 Received: from d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d03av03.boulder.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.13.1/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id r3NKGUJs005079 for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 14:16:30 -0600 Message-ID: <5176EC1C.4000409@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:16:28 -0400 From: "Michael R. Hines" MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1366682139-22122-1-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87li89dtmc.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <5176CADB.4000304@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <87k3ntm7co.fsf@codemonkey.ws> In-Reply-To: <87k3ntm7co.fsf@codemonkey.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] rdma: migration support List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony Liguori Cc: quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, owasserm@redhat.com, Bulent Abali , Michael R Hines , Gokul B Kandiraju , pbonzini@redhat.com On 04/23/2013 02:26 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > "Michael R. Hines" writes: > >> On 04/23/2013 01:50 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes: >>> >>>> From: "Michael R. Hines" >>>> >>>> Juan, Please pull. >>> I assume this is actually v6, not v5? >>> >>> I don't see collected Reviewed-bys... >>> >>> That said, we're pretty close to hard freeze. I think this should wait >>> until 1.6 opens up although I'm open to suggestion if people think this >>> is low risk. I don't like the idea of adding a new protocol this close >>> to the end of a cycle. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Anthony Liguori >> There are no instructions/procedures documented on the qemu.org >> website on how to automatically generate "Reviewed-by" signatures. > I suspect there's some confusion here. Addressed review comments != > Reviewed-by. There can always be additional comments. Someone has to > explicitly offer a Reviewed-by indicating that they are happy with the > patches overall. I've gone through the history on these patches and I > don't see any explicit Reviewed-by's other than Eric's most recent one. > > Give the series a little more time for people to look over it, it'll get > Reviewed-bys when people are ready to offer them. > > Regards, > > Anthony Liguori Acknowledged.