From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:54173)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UUkVM-0003yX-RK
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:12:01 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UUkVL-0003W5-TX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:12:00 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32766)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1UUkVL-0003W1-KJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Apr 2013 17:11:59 -0400
Message-ID: <5176F90E.9080006@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 23:11:42 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <1366682139-22122-1-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<87li89dtmc.fsf@codemonkey.ws>
	<5176CADB.4000304@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<87k3ntm7co.fsf@codemonkey.ws> <5176DFFD.1040202@redhat.com>
	<5176EBE9.3080204@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
In-Reply-To: <5176EBE9.3080204@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 00/12] rdma: migration support
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: "Michael R. Hines" <mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, owasserm@redhat.com, Bulent Abali <abali@us.ibm.com>, Michael R Hines <mrhines@us.ibm.com>, Gokul B Kandiraju <gokul@us.ibm.com>

Il 23/04/2013 22:15, Michael R. Hines ha scritto:
>>
>> Also, don't be surprised if not everyone reviews the entire series;
>> sometimes reviewers like myself focus only on the portion of the series
>> that interacts with my current interests (I tend to review anything QMP,
>> because I want to make sure the design will be sane for libvirt
>> interaction, while overlooking things like migration internals because
>> they are black box ops to libvirt if the interface was sane).
>>
> 
> Yes, Paolo has done a fantastic job of reviewing the internals.

But the internals have changed while I wasn't looking. :)

I'm very close to giving my Reviewed-by, I would just prefer to have
this last change reverted.

Paolo