From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40697) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUtM1-0005Tx-20 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:38:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUtM0-00019z-4M for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:38:56 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:58882) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UUtLz-00019o-So for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 02:38:56 -0400 Message-ID: <51777DEF.4080900@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 08:38:39 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1366682139-22122-1-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1366682139-22122-12-git-send-email-mrhines@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <5176F647.6010302@redhat.com> <51771EFB.5080201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <51771EFB.5080201@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v5 11/12] rdma: core logic List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: "Michael R. Hines" Cc: aliguori@us.ibm.com, quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, owasserm@redhat.com, abali@us.ibm.com, mrhines@us.ibm.com, gokul@us.ibm.com Il 24/04/2013 01:53, Michael R. Hines ha scritto: > > So, I started investigating the problem, and I noticed that whenever > I disabled the limits of max_size, the throughput went back to > the normal throughput (peak of 26 gbps). > > So, rather than change the default max_size calculation for TCP, > which would improperly impact existing users of TCP migration, > I introduced a new QEMUFileOps change to solve the problem. > > What do you think? I'd prefer to remove this and understand it better for 1.6. I'd be in favor of getting this in 1.5, but without this hook. Paolo