From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60660) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UV1r5-0002kn-UO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:43:40 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UV1qy-00080k-S4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 11:43:35 -0400 Message-ID: <5177FD98.6040500@suse.de> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 17:43:20 +0200 From: =?UTF-8?B?QW5kcmVhcyBGw6RyYmVy?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1366768096-2846-1-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1366768096-2846-2-git-send-email-lig.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> <1366787706.20507.10.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> <1366788738.20507.18.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> <1366789222.20507.20.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com> <5177EA89.1080503@suse.de> <20130424154013.GA4957@hall.aurel32.net> In-Reply-To: <20130424154013.GA4957@hall.aurel32.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-*/cpu.h: remove cs_base for other targets List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Aurelien Jarno Cc: Peter Maydell , jan.kiszka@siemens.com, green@moxielogic.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, jcmvbkbc@gmail.com, edgar.iglesias@gmail.com, gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn, proljc@gmail.com, agraf@suse.de, evgenyvoevodin@gmail.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, sw@weilnetz.de, paul@codesourcery.com, stefanha@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, rth@twiddle.net, aliguori@us.ibm.com, Laurent@vivier.eu, michael@walle.cc, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, li guang Am 24.04.2013 17:40, schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 04:22:01PM +0200, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: >> We're in Soft Freeze, so in general no new big patch series will go in= to >> 1.5 unless there's a maintainer willing to take care of it - for i386 >> there is none, and random code cleanups do not look like something we >> must absolutely have in the release last minute. At least no one broug= ht >> up on yesterday's call that this is a must-have, so maybe after the >> release would be a better time to let people review this? >> >=20 > Being in soft or hard freeze should not prevent people to send patches, > and nothing here says that they should be included in 1.5. True, but then again reviewers are more likely to look at such a touch-all patch when there's not more pressing patches to be reviewed before Hard Freeze. Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=C3=BCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=C3=B6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=C3=BC= rnberg