From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60876) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UV4kj-00044l-8o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:49:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UV4ke-0002Bb-NI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:49:13 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56077 helo=mx2.suse.de) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UV4ke-0002BL-HY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:49:08 -0400 Message-ID: <5178291F.3090607@suse.de> Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:49:03 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1366799842-18550-1-git-send-email-hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> <5177C23F.8050603@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <5177C23F.8050603@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ich9: kill cmos_s3 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Hu Tao , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am 24.04.2013 13:30, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > Il 24/04/2013 12:37, Hu Tao ha scritto: >> Signed-off-by: Hu Tao >=20 > I had exactly the same patch in my 1.6 queue. :) >=20 > Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini The commit message fails to explain *why* we can drop updating whatever RTC memory value there though? Andreas --=20 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N=FCrnberg, Germany GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imend=F6rffer; HRB 16746 AG N=FCrnbe= rg