From: Liu Yuan <namei.unix@gmail.com>
To: sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
MORITA Kazutaka <morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] sheepdog: fix loadvm operation
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 12:12:58 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5178AD4A.6050306@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1366822079-6582-1-git-send-email-namei.unix@gmail.com>
On 04/25/2013 12:47 AM, Liu Yuan wrote:
> - don't break old behavior if we boot up on the snapshot by using s->reverted
> to indicate if we delete working VDI successfully
If we implement 'boot from snapshot' == loadvm snapshot, we don't need
s->reverted. What do you think, Kazutaka? With this idea, qemu -hda
sheepdog:test:id will be virtually the same as qemu -hda sheepdog:test
-loadvm id.
I don't understand the usecase for snapshting current workding VDI and
then restore to the specified snapshot.
Thanks,
Yuan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 4:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-24 16:47 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] sheepdog: fix loadvm operation Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 4:12 ` Liu Yuan [this message]
2013-04-25 8:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-25 8:27 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 8:42 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3] " Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 9:40 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-25 9:44 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 10:03 ` MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-25 12:32 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 12:49 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] " Liu Yuan
2013-04-25 13:06 ` [Qemu-devel] [sheepdog] " MORITA Kazutaka
2013-04-26 9:04 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-26 11:39 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2013-04-26 11:48 ` Liu Yuan
2013-04-26 11:41 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5178AD4A.6050306@gmail.com \
--to=namei.unix@gmail.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=morita.kazutaka@lab.ntt.co.jp \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=sheepdog@lists.wpkg.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).