From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59668) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVeBW-0001jH-JJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:39:16 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVeBV-0005qL-AI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:39:14 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2464) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UVeBV-0005q0-2e for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:39:13 -0400 Message-ID: <517A3D11.9020702@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:38:41 +0200 From: Paolo Bonzini MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1366799842-18550-1-git-send-email-hutao@cn.fujitsu.com> <5177C23F.8050603@redhat.com> <5178291F.3090607@suse.de> In-Reply-To: <5178291F.3090607@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ich9: kill cmos_s3 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andreas_F=E4rber?= Cc: Hu Tao , qemu-devel@nongnu.org Il 24/04/2013 20:49, Andreas F=E4rber ha scritto: > Am 24.04.2013 13:30, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: >> Il 24/04/2013 12:37, Hu Tao ha scritto: >>> Signed-off-by: Hu Tao >> >> I had exactly the same patch in my 1.6 queue. :) >> >> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini >=20 > The commit message fails to explain *why* we can drop updating whatever > RTC memory value there though? Ultimately the argument was unused (see the ich9_pm_init part of the patch). This is now done with s->suspend_notifier.notify =3D rtc_notify_suspend; qemu_register_suspend_notifier(&s->suspend_notifier); in hw/timer/mc146818rtc.c. Paolo